Many of the statements in this weeks reading I found to relate to much more than tutoring. The first example that caught my attention was the willingness of the tutor to help and the willingness of the client to be there (7-8). If no one is willing to do anything then the whole idea of a writing center will automatically be set up for failure. However, this goes much deeper than a writing center. This is true for any kind of relationship in life.
I disagree with the statement "... the tutor has only hit-or-miss, trial-and-error experimentation to rely on - often at the student's expense" (7). I think this puts too much strain on the tutor. Most things in life begin with the process of trial-and-error. Without this method how do you discover any new ways of doing things? It is a common reflex for a person to try something else if their first idea didn't work.
Although I agree with the statement "Ultimately, successful tutors are willing to modify their views and procedures as new insights emerge" (7) I think it contradicts the claim that trial-and-error is not a successful method. However, a tutor who refuses to adopt any new method will not be able to help every student that comes their way.
I relate to the type of problems students who enter the writing center have. I am an English major and naturally write decent papers, but not everything comes to me as easy as writing does. Case and point is my first science class at college level. It was a disaster and I just couldn't do it. This naturally turned into not even trying to do it. I likely would of had a bad attitude in a tutoring session for that class much like people who struggle with writing do. Most of my problem was the fact that I always made good grades and never had to try too hard before and I struggled to accept the idea that I actually needed help. Murphy gives several examples of struggling students initial attitudes. I identified with one of them that read, "I've always made A's in English in high school, so I know iI should be making A's in college, too" (96). Reading this reminded me of that first semester of college.
The writers of this book have a very tall order for their ideal tutor. On page eight it lists the "traits effective tutors share... good intentions, strong writing and editing skills, flexibility, an eagerness to help, an analytical yet creative mind, a diedication to excellence, good listening skills, and ability to be supportive yet hones, a willingness to work hard, a sense of humor, sensitivity to others, careful judgment, patience, and a dedication to collaborative learning." WOW! This passage made my eyes open wide. On a good day most people do good to be half of these things.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I laughed when I read your "WOW" - yes, the textbook authors do give us a very tall order for being tutors! But you're right: We are not going to be all of these things every single day. I think the best we can hope for is to be enough of what a client needs enough of the time that we encourage her/him to keep working on their writing, to keep coming back to the center until they no longer need us (which, if we realize that writing is a craft we develop over a lifetime, may be never).
ReplyDeleteI think your point about remembering that just because we're good at writing doesn't mean we are skilled in every area of academe is very well-taken. It makes me think of a question you asked today in class: What happens if a student is concerned that the tutor lacks expertise in her/his area? I think the flipside of that is, What happens if a student feels that because the tutor knows how to write, the tutor is much, much smarter and more capable than she is? In this instance, pointing out your struggles in other areas, like science (or, for me, math), and finding out what areas the client really excels in can be very, very important in establishing the right kind of rapport.
When I read the passage about what the ideal tutor should be, I kind of questioned if I should be here! I mean, I would like to consider myself able to tutor, but those are some pretty tough credentials. I am glad we get to observe the other tutors though. I have noticed that they do not always have the answers. In fact, one of the tutors turned to me with a simple grammatical question. I was so comforted by her question because it revealed she was not some kind of fountain of knowledge to which I could never compare. I have seen her help many students every time I am in the writering room, and so I consider her very good at her job. Now I see that it is okay to not always have the answers or to not be what is described as the idea tutor. I find that if you are willing to work with clients to really help their understanding, you'll make a fine tutor.
ReplyDelete